I’m not.

We already have an implementation. You me and OP are all on Lemmy. So can you answer these in the context of Lemmy again?

If you die on the flight, technically true statement.

No you don’t.

So alpha males are males who are unrefined and flawed? 🤔

Contrary to popular opinion, as a kid, I really liked clippy and other office assistants. Not to get office tips though, I liked to cycle through their fun animations.

Sounds like a pos.

Also that sounds very illegal, no complaints have been filed or anything?

Do what happened if you bring a book to class already signed?

Yeah sorry, I meant registers.

What do you mean by regular target? I am either yanking from the OS buffer or yanking things from 2 different buffers. Or I have 2 macros where they yank from different buffers.

Buffers are great. Comes very handy when creating macros in vim.

It’s not better because your offset time is much granuler and hard to calculate in your mind than timezones. And it doesn’t offer anything new over timezones. Since you suggested it, you must see a benefit. What is it?

How is it better?

We are using GMT + timezones. You are the one who opposed timezones and said you have a different approach. But yours is exactly like timezones. My question is that why should anyone switch to something “like” timezones when there are actual timezones?

Your proposal is exactly how time is used at my work. All meetings are in GMT. You use the timezone time when thinking locally. Instead of everyone using GMT and timezones already, why should we introduce a while new concept?

So what are these offset’s you mentioned? They are not used?

Can you give me an example with an example time and how 2 people in different countries would organise a meeting?

Did you just describe timezones?

Makefile obviously. What the heck is a “make-up”?

Of course not! Cash is also acceptable.