• 6 Posts
  • 82 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle



  • Jesus@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldEscape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    It kind of depends on the job and the size of the company. My father was an engineer and spent time in offices and open floors full of drawing tables. The small companies could accommodate offices, but that was too hard to pull off with larger companies.

    I remember some old offices buildings at MS where they tried to give everyone a little baby office, and it was actually pretty depressing and weird.




  • Jesus@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldEscape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 days ago

    A lot of offices didn’t, and some still don’t, consider the design of the floor plan. You’d end up with beige cubes filling most of the floor, with no little chill spots to break out and collaborate.

    IMHO, a good floor plan has some areas for people to hide and focus, some comfortable areas to collaborate outside of a conference room, and some areas to recharge.


  • Jesus@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldEscape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    21 days ago

    Gen X in their 20s: “Fuck these soulless cubicles.”

    Gen X in their 40s: “We’re the boss now. Kill the cubicles. Open floor plan.”

    Millennials in their 20s: “Fuck this distracting open floor plan.”

    Millennials in their 40s: “I’m the boss now. Kill the open floor plan. Cubicles.


  • Jesus@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldConspiracies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Half a century” is the big challenge in that sentence. The Manhattan project started in 42 and Japan was bombed in 45.

    They also had near slips with the press and foreign espionage happening within the project. That would’ve been real tough to keep secret from the public for decades.


  • Jesus@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldConspiracies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not the size of the organization, it’s the size of the team with a particular piece of information, and the monetary or moral pressure to release a particular piece of information.

    Also, the NSA famously has had leakers. The biggest and most notable being Snowden in 2013.


  • Jesus@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldConspiracies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you’ve ever tried to coordinate more than 50 people to do a thing, you quickly realize why people refer to management and leadership jobs as “herding cats.”

    If someone gave me the option of faking the moon landing or going to the moon, I’d gladly strap a submarine to a missile.

    It be fucking impossible to coordinate hundreds of people on the world’s biggest secret, then make them and their families abide by media training for half a century.





  • I’m a weirdo who builds compliance and auditing software for this very use case. Getting functioning hardware or software from a vendor l is one thing. You can QA whether it’s up to spec.

    Vetting compliance with operational best practices is a different can of worms. You have to check compliance with random audits and investigations, and people that want to hide shit will try to work around that random checking.

    All in all, it’s one of those things that probably seems simple when you’re looking at it from afar, but if you’re actually trying to do the job, you know it’s way more complicated than outsiders realize.


  • Jesus@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldApple is ''deeply committed''.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’d be curious to see what the audit paper trail looks like for this. Companies like Apple now have third party due diligence programs in place. Said plainly, their legal teams purchase software solutions that track their vendors, their vendor’s vendors, and their vendor’s vendor’s vendors.

    Apple’s legal team is pretty robust, and I’d be shocked if they didn’t hand over a bunch of TPDD documentation to auditors to try to say “here’s all the records of us inspecting our vendors and their vendors.”

    Apple will likely point to the vendor, blame them for criminal or unethical practices, and then showcase their paper trail and their system of vetting controls. Companies don’t have to be perfect, but they generally have to show that they made a legitimate and good faith attempt to work with vendors that are above board.




  • Same. I feel like, a few decades ago, you could make a good argument that PPO land gave you more choice in exchange for higher fees. But these days, the good private practices are completely slammed, and I honestly think it’s faster and easier to find a good doctor or specialist in Kaiser.

    The crazy thing is that my spouse works for one of America’s PPO insurance companies, and she’s rather use my Kaiser plans. The care is better and the out of pocket is way less.


  • Kaiser Permanente is not for profit and not publicly traded. It’s not perfect, and it’s not cheap, but having dealt with America’s other insurance options, IMHO, it’s the best option in the US… if they’re in your state, and if you take the time to learn how to navigate an HMO.

    Its not cheap, but it’s not nearly as expensive as the alternatives, and the don’t deny claims as much.