lad

I see, so I was wrong then

Maybe I should try colour codes on windows when I get to it 😅 thanks for the info

I thought, colour codes are platform dependent, will it work on windows

I usually run things on Linux or macOS, but using a library (crate) may add portability, imo

You know, this is ironic

I couldn’t agree more with the latter part, I know a lot of backend engineers who consider frontend simple without ever trying what it really takes. This is not a healthy way to view someone else’s work, and it usually produces friction between back and front end teams

I was toldo the other day that in ten years there will be no testers because developers will do all the testing.

I’ve seen how it works out in practice: there’s not enough time for testing and for developing, too, developers are going to burn and the product is going to be shit done and shit tested. Maybe it works if your company is willing to spend extra for less results by someone doing all the stuff less efficient than what they could, but that’s a rare occurrence.

Also, if this is only a change in managing bugs, nothing may have changed except for more bug tracking for trivial bugs, or the opposite, ignoring more severe bugs

Oh, yeah, I kinda mixed together liking and supporting in the ‘appreciate’.

false dichotomy arguments that you can’t appreciate music made by a person if that person is considered a bad person

For me this is more about making someone more popular and making them profits by listening to their music. And then there’s also a possibility that someone is considered a bad person for their views that are also displayed in their music, then I consider that I might start viewing their opinion as the norm, and also prefer not to listen to them.

All in all, I agree that the dichotomy is false, but I think it has some sense in some cases.

For me, type system is the most important feature for a programming language to be pleasant to use. It’s very nice to see that Rust doesn’t stop on what it already has, which is already pretty good, imo.

Yeah, I wanted to reference Dune, too, but then thought that it’s not a very rare trope. On a related note, I took a look at tvtropes and it says that in the Dune the AI didn’t wage war, it was humans that didn’t like what AI does and prohibited it. I read the books too long ago to remember if this is so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah, but they literally used the term as used in Warhammer lore: A.I.

In Warhammer AI is forbidden on the grounds of past wars with humanity

Almost nowhere but America exists /s

Since age tends to not decrease, that may make sense: once you reach 18 you get a signed token you can use forever.

Your token might be used by someone else, though

Only last year? I thought it was the whole last decade

Or earlier, possibly

Sounds great, but as far as I know Diffie–Hellman doesn’t protect from MitM attack if there’s no trusted party to prove the integrity of keys sent. I skimmed through the description but this seems not to touch on that theme. Maybe it’s sharing public keys in person time again.

Oh, that explains it. Well, I imagine a license that also forbids people to imagine it. Fuck you and your imagination

The screenshot seems to violate the licence it contains.

I meant ‘make sense’ to mean ‘could rewrite without garbage’. Maybe I was wrong, anyway

I’m afraid, LLMs are gone a bit further from the state when such ‘poisoning’ made sense.

I’m afraid that soon this may reach a point where it will be easier for LLM to make sense of the text, than for a human, if this idea gets further development.