Superb

I don’t understand what you’re getting at? Clearly book one is meant to give a foundation to every the other books in the series. Now you’re getting all huffy because you don’t understand this book without that foundation.

I’m not saying that you’re wrong or stupid. I’m saying if you read the first book then you might actually get something out of the rest. You also might not! It’s equally possible that this series just isn’t helpful for you.

Right, volumes 2-3 are independent. Volume 1 isn’t.

I don’t think your opinion is necessarily wrong, but you should give the books another try starting from 1.

You should also have a way to convert from version 1 to version 2. Then if someone loads an old version you can save it back in the new format.

You’re right, I hope the two of you are very happy

Honey your AI girlfriend doesn’t actually love you

It really depends on your needs. In most cases, I wouldn’t even bother.

I do have a project with a some software running on a microcontroller and a corresponding driver. I don’t record a build number, but I do record the timestamp when the build occurred. That way the driver can update the firmware if its timestamp is older than expected

There aren’t even any standard in this field. If someone wants to hire a good developer, how to do they know who to pick? Its a clusterfuck at every level

At what companies? I don’t think half of my team spends much time programming outside of work and they all still got hired

Make things!

Whether you’re working on FOSS project or your own personal projects, building cool and diverse stuff that you’re passionate about is the best way to get experience quick.

Regarding your personal project, starting over is usually not a bad idea. Especially if your own skills have grown a bunch since starting. Make sure you keep old versions around for reference!

I’ve personally never gotten much out of freelancing or coding challenges. I think it depends on if you see CS more as a career or more as a passion (both of those are perfectly legitimate). I should also mention, a lot of professionals don’t do any programming outside of work. You don’t need to dedicate time outside of work to be good at this job.

The most important thing is to have fun and not to burn yourself out. Take care of your body and mind!

If it can automatically accelerate a program that has parallel data dependencies, that would also be a huge claim, but one that is at least theoretically possible.

You nailed it! That’s exactly what this is! Read through their README, and the paper attached. It’s very cool tech

Good thing they don’t claim that. Read the README, they make very nuanced and reasonable claims about their very impressive language

Who knew auditing could be so easy!

I have to purchase the standard, and I see no examples

Boeing used to be the superior plane, but their quality control has taken a serious nose dive

But people are already in danger, the planes are falling apart

What?

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

You should spend your time at work doing work and your time at home doing anything else. Some people really enjoying programming and building in their off time, some people don’t. Follow your interests :)

Why can’t it be both a condemnation of C++ AND an inevitable consequence of success? C++ was a success, but we’ve learned a lot and it’s time to move on