That’s option 2 or 3, right?

It’s an interesting problem.

Does the EU let Chinese vehicles in, allow the reduction of EU manufacturing, reducing jobs available, possibly imposing further poverty on the poor, and possibly to the point where they can’t afford the Chinese vehicles anyway?

Does the EU add taxes to Chinese vehicles, making them less available to the poor, but possibly protecting jobs within the EU? Perhaps whilst trying to engage EU automakers to make more EVs?

Does the EU add taxes to Chinese vehicles, without pushing the change to EVs, and just not really manage this situation well?

My money is on aspirations for option 2, but in reality option 3.

I respect that dad’s haircut. Accepted reality and keeping things neat. Strong man.

Hmm, my thinking was that journeys that use the full range of the electric vehicle are the exception though.

So in your example, it makes sense to have a ICE vehicle as you require the range. Most of us though don’t need that range. Most of us are unlikely to regularly be driving over 200 miles for a commute, and therefore EVs make sense for all of these people.

For your scenario, if you are motivated enough to do this, it might even work out cheaper to buy an EV, and rent an ICE car for your longer trip. But fair enough that this would be much less convenient.

One source for my thinking: https://www.statista.com/chart/24684/average-duration-of-a-one-way-commute/

Can you counter point it rather than just saying ‘not thinking’? From these comments you’re coming off as the not thinking one.

It makes sense that Ukraine would cosy up to USA if USA has something Ukraine needs, no?

Not about lessers, just others.

You do you is a great mantra, as long as you doing you isn’t negatively affecting others.

If Microsoft are worried about Linux now, imagine what they’ll feel once it activates!

But but there’s a person on the internet that might be wrong! *shakes fist at sky*

I wish more effort was put in to gamifying education courses.

It’s annoyingly fairly priced. I’m fairly sure they’re doing this at a loss to put competitors in the music streaming services out of business so they can hack up the price.

Standard Google/TV streaming service practice.

I feel like this describes pretty much every western society since we moved beyond tribalism.

I’d say it’s not the LLM at fault. The LLM is essentially an innocent. It’s the same as a four year old being told if they clap hard enough they’ll make thunder. It’s not the kids fault that they’re being fed bad information.

The parents (companies) should be more responsible about what they tell their kids (LLMS)

Edit. Disregard this though if I’ve completely misunderstood your comment.

5 mins build and test times Vs 1hr build times.

I know that can be achieved by setting a monolith up to be more segregated in design, but my experience so far is that that rarely happens.

Ms architecture forces the segregation, which helps keep me sane (:

Removed by mod

I mean, if oat milk is going to make you less healthy, why are we concerned about the water usage if it’s still a better alternative to cows milk on both counts?

There’s no industrial water usage in sticks I find when out walking. That doesn’t mean I’m going to put them in my cereal (intentional hyperbole to make the point).

What’s also the case for animal milk sorry?

Just look out that oat is a carb. If you’re having oat milk with cereal then you’re having carb with carb.

This is another straw on the camels back to svrewing up your sugar levels and potentially giving you diabetes.

I’m no super healthy guy, but a friend of mine had this issue where they were on the high glucose side due to their diet, this was one of the things they needed to cut out.

Almond milk I think was the better alternative.

I wonder how much time they have to use those ski passes anyway.

Has Sunak just said jack shit about this?

Are you guys remembering what you did more than 15 hours ago?