- 0 Posts
- 21 Comments
You can be anti-genocide and still have enough of a working brain left to recognize singling out one political party at a time on the genocide in Gaza is a disingenuous argument, cause they both suck, and that specifically targetting the Dems ignores the part that Trump would happily let his good friend Bibi turn Gaza into glass.
It’s a dumb pro-GOP propaganda meme, and people that think shit memes like this have value are dangerous because they encourage voter apathy.
God what a transparently lame pro-Trump propaganda meme. Boooorrring, next!
Are any “undecided” voters actually swayed by this useless garbage?
All I need are good alternatives to:
- find or coordinate local events
- post used things for sale
and Facebook is totally irrelevant to me. The way people switched from Kijiji to Marketplace absolutely screwed me over for leaving Meta.
All I need are good alternatives to:
- find or coordinate local events
- post used things for sale
and Facebook is totally irrelevant to me. The way people switched from Kijiji to Marketplace absolutely screwed me over for leaving Meta.
2·9 months agoYou’re right, and this is an excellent idea. If you’re turning an asset into a cashflow, it should be taxable under all circumstances.
It’s a start. Its a modest increase in capital gains inclusion (66% instead of 50%) for all capital gains over $250,000 per year
So, good, normal people won’t be affected at all, but only super wealthy folks triggering a quarter million in gains every single year are going to feel any effect. And unfortunately, there’s more than a few ways to just avoid triggering gains anyways.
Eh, at least it’s a start.
Sounds like a pretty big win to me? Who answers emails after hours, yuck
This is our chance to make this person’s dreams come alive by downvoting them into oblivion!
Those are the people making America great again!
Ahh, after all this time, the Socratic Method still reigns
Since we’re all dummies and you know the answers, please go ahead and explain how Google goes about selling heavily targeted ads to uniquely identifiable groups, but that they also are not “selling data”.
Are we being massively pedantic and saying that it’s not actual user data, but rather leveraging said data to sell ads to the anonymized targeted groups, who are actively tracked by Google around the internet so ads can be served up at opportune times in their browsing?
Because that dumb argument is like saying Oxford Dictionary doesn’t sell words, they sell definitions; or that McDonalds doesn’t sell beef, they sell hamburgers.
Sorry if I miscommunicated. No, they’re not selling your home address. But the idea that they aren’t monetizing your personal data aggressively is laughably wrong and heavily documented.
Literally everyone. Have you been living under a rock?
A man’s gotta have a dream
They’ve got the biggest and best resume when it comes to colonizin; can’t let all that experience go to waste!
I get that Canada needs a good relationship with the United States, but this is both deplorable and embarassing on an international stage to have our government leaders vote in favour of continued genocide.
Is the one in the bottom left actually called “No Need YT Ads”? Cause I can’t find that one