Their sacrifice in WW2, which was from a certain point on deliberate and ideology based(as in that they would not accept any rule of nazi ideology), has served even you. Unless you want a world where the nazis didnt lose, you too are in the debt of these tankies.

While Im not a tankie, they do have some historical appeal. You know like beating the Nazis, some small things here and there.

Thanks NATO.

The people want to be free as in Ukraine. Look how that “reasonable” policy worked out for them.

Yes and relevantly here it also ceases the necessity of total eradication.

So you dont have a source of this definition? Because in international law its defined quite differently, which is quite obvious since your definition, as given, would not classify many real instances as genocide.

What do you mean by your last point. Genocide only being on whole population. Where did you get this definition.

Damn I never thought about this narrative. Its kidna funny that scary russians interfere with the US elections, while literally all US corporations which run social networks interfere with all countries elections excluding those where they are banned.

Ok I got you. For me personally China usually seems like a decent alternative. I dont think that they are perfect.

I trust China far more than slovak government. I dont think that these deals with China will go this way, its more like when the other options(real alternatives offered currently) are bad they will get a deal with China. But normatively yes I guess, its just too much to ask of such governments judging by their current failures.

And none of these wrote the article.

Oh I see so what is the alternative offered to Slovaks then?

Wait so you claim to be left and somehow oppose partnership with China? How am I to understand this?

I recall two instances. Brno death march and the deliberate bombing of Berlin civilians. Many died in the expulsions. However this probably doesn’t begin to cover the topic.

Also I somehow forgot to mention that there were neonazis in government positions before zelenskys administration.

Where was there any extrapolation? I just didnt understand the need to downplay azov and the western-backed nazis. You also failed to actually react to my questions.

While I also dont think that denazification was the actual reason for the invasion, I dont understand your point. The us was backing the nazis and while they lost heavily in elections, because most ukrainians are not extremists, they were commiting crimes against the russian ethnicity ukrainians. Was it better to wait? Or to send even more weapons to the separatists? I’m not saying that the invasion was justified, I just dont get your take.

As a german what is your view on free speech. I hear concerning stuff on germany these days.

Nelson Mandela was a terrorist in the US till 2008. Do you consider him as a resistance fighter now?

Maybe some people agree with your stance on the territory.(I use the UN declaration of where the occupation is illegal). Nevertheless germans cannot argue that its anti israel, since they have to recognize that the occupation is illegal in the ‘occupied territories’ which are not usually defined as all of israel furthermore you cannot be an occupier of your own territory so since germans recognize israel your argument would not apply to them. But i agree that if the whole territory was considered as under occupation(which it almost never is) you would be right.