— Honey, can you cut me a slice of bread?
— You have my sword!
— I walked into this one, didn’t I?
— Honey, can you cut me a slice of bread?
— You have my sword!
— I walked into this one, didn’t I?
The performance of nuclear power must be calculated in relation to its cost and risk. And here renewable energy is more than competitive.
They vom it.
So how would the judges be appointed under this system and why is it better than having them chosen from the people?
By competition and diploma. A judge is a legal technician. Why elect him on political bases? We do not elect an engineer on political criteria, we take the one who seems the best among the candidates.
If the current system hasn’t prevented political influence, then the method of choosing obviously isn’t guaranteeing unbiased judges anyway, so what’s the point in keeping it as opposed to elected judges?
What’s the point to elect them?
Strong and diverse press, strong and enforced rules against politically motivated decisions. A judge should know that, if they don’t strictly follow the law, they’ll lose their job. This won’t make the thing perfect, but far better than officially political judges.
Not a fan of Vivaldi, but that’s the spirit.
You follow the tankie definition of fascism? “Everything at the right of the bolshevism is fascism”?
You have no idea of what fascism is.
That’s not the point. The point is: Ukraine is a normal country, nor a fascist hellhole nor a perfect Paradise. Their national symbol is also used by its far right, today and during the WWII; just like all other countries under the Nazi rule in Europe. And just like all other countries under the Nazi rule in Europe, they continued to use their national symbols after the WWII.
Vichy France of Pétain participated in the Holocaust too. France still use the fasces, the same anthem and the same flag.
And the tryzub didn’t mean fascism when it was firstly adopted by the (menchevik communist) Ukrainian People’s Republic in 1917…
Symbols have more than one meaning… The word “fascism” comes from one of these symbols: the Fasces. However the fasces are still used by France:
Or by the US:
Are these countries fascists just because they use the Fasces? Of course not. They have other meanings. It’s the same with this Ukrainian symbol.
Israel is a country. Fascism is a type of government.
You can want the end of the fascist government without wanting the end of the country.
A two state solution is one possibility, but there is no strict requirement that it is the only or best way to serve the needs of those involved.
It’s true. But it’s not for us to decide.
I think you didn’t understood me. I’m criticizing Israel. It’s a criminal state.I just say that to criticize Israel and saying that Israel.shouldn’t exist are two different things.
Israel is a lot of things, but not an ethnostate. Falashas and Sefardim aren’t white, and they’re recognized as citizens as much as Ashkenazim, at least legally (there is racism between Jews in Israel too, but it’s the case everywhere).
I don’t understand why Israel is the only criminal State in the world that progressive people want totally destroyed. Russia, Iran, Syria, … are imperialist criminal states too, and progressive people “only” want their government changed. I want the fascist government of Israel overthrown, but I have no right to call for the destruction of the country itself. The only difference is Judaism.
If the Jew people of Palestine want the independence, who are we to deny it? The only moral solution in this case is the two states solution.
Thus you’re denying the right of self determination for the Jew people. QED.
It would be replaced by what?
The flags are wrong, though.