You must log in or register to comment.
A matrix is already wearing chaps and needs no additional leg wear.
Wearable for infinite matrices
C vs Fortran
My matrices wear Hilbert Pants
Clearly would have one leg per column - joint at the top row
That is a pant, not pants
Both - one leg each way.
If either, a symmetric matrix would stop being symmetric and would hence not be able to wear pants. With this conclusion in mind I propose that symmetric matrices are from now on called naked matrices instead.
It would wear it in the direction of the matrix determinant calculation, the right leg on the positive direction and the left leg on the negative
eigenpants
Why are we not considering the matrix as a whole, but as a fucking snake or something?
