• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    If you’re just doing a quick config edit, nano is significantly easier to use and is also present in most distros.

    Vi/Vim is useful as a customizable dev environment, but in the present there are better, more feature-rich development tools - unless you are specifically doing a lot of development in a GUI-free system, for some reason.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      I mean, if youre continually updating files on remote take the time to learn vim. My God it’s a million times more efficient. Even using the keybindings in an ide makes sense.

      That and Im not aware that rhel distros at all have nano built in. Nothing on a random rocky 9 box I randomly sshed into just now.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      vim is more feature rich than nano, nano is easier to use for the first time, after you learn the very basics vim is pretty much just as easy to use and way more feature rich

    • nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      What editor is more feature-rich then vim? Out the box it is lacking some sane config but it is one of the more powerful and flexible editors out there - more then a rival for any modern IDE.