Galactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-22 小时前Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up171arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up165arrow-down1external-linkLet's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comGalactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-22 小时前message-square8linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
I was curious about your opinions (Not my article). Also this mentions Fossil & Pijul. Which are fully-fledged Git-Alternatives (Not just github)
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31arrow-down2·14 天前You don’t need git alternatives. git has nothing to do with fascistsoft. Please don’t confuse a repo hosting service with the (FOSS) tools used thereon. Alternative for github: codeberg.org
minus-squareKissaki@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-213 天前 Alternative for github: codeberg.org only for public FOSS
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 天前Partially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.
You don’t need git alternatives. git has nothing to do with fascistsoft. Please don’t confuse a repo hosting service with the (FOSS) tools used thereon.
Alternative for github: codeberg.org
only for
publicFOSSWhy is that a bad thing ?
Partially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.