• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s certainly better than “look at the pictures and guess”.

    Go read (or listen to) the article. People who have studied this more than either of us have weighed in.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          How is it hubris to say that not every student learns the same way? For real? No it’s hubris to say that everybody should have to learn the same way and you’re fucked if you don’t learn well.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Because it doesn’t seem like you’ve read the article nor have any real expertise in education, but you’re making grand pronouncements anyway.

            “People learn in different ways” may be true, but is irrelevant to the point that some ways of teaching reading are ineffective or even counter-productive

              • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Nobody said phonics is a perfect method, but against evidence showing it does substantially better at getting kids to learn how to read, you rocked up to contribute what amounts to “This is bullshit, because I didn’t like it as a kid.” We aren’t discussing how private tutors work, but how to get the public school system to get the best results in aggregate.

                Every kid learns differently, sure. But we can’t even staff schools at adequate levels to hold decent group instruction, much less provide tailored education for each student, so your reply about everything being wrong until every every child has their unique idiosyncrasies accounted for comes across as a bit daft in the context of the discussion.

              • jtrek@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                More of an inference that an assumption, really. But go on. Did you read the article? Do you have any expertise on the subject?

                • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Yes. And yes. But you don’t want to talk about that it even says in the paragraph after the one you quoted that it didn’t work everywhere so what’s the point of even trying to talk to you?