Well he Is right that the secretary generals of a nation cant be based on dynasty.
I dont belive i “authoritarianisn” but really, its a Vanguard party so they have democratic centralism of im not wrong.
How much Does It take to elect a different one.
And they are right, as many others marxists Say, we dont belive CIA propaganda but we can still be critical on proven facts and not being Is Just stupid
Indeed. But seriously, how does passing on leadership to their child for two generations in a row not give cause to super grave concern for all socialists?
One can be socialist and critical of dynastic states
One can lick boots and pretend to be a revolutionary lol
Well he Is right that the secretary generals of a nation cant be based on dynasty.
I dont belive i “authoritarianisn” but really, its a Vanguard party so they have democratic centralism of im not wrong. How much Does It take to elect a different one.
And they are right, as many others marxists Say, we dont belive CIA propaganda but we can still be critical on proven facts and not being Is Just stupid
Indeed. But seriously, how does passing on leadership to their child for two generations in a row not give cause to super grave concern for all socialists?
Because we’re too busy worrying about the US trying to starve Korean people. Material realities dominate superstructural minutiae.