People that make claims without evidence will have them dismissed for exactly that reason. If that’s putting you off, then kiss off…

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: May 3rd, 2026

help-circle




  • What I love is all the shit that influencers peddle that will harm you and your offspring, permanently.

    It’s not bad enough you’re vegan… But now iodized salt is apparently ‘glass’ (I guess because it contains trace amounts of silica aka sand.) yet you don’t think sea salt is going to also contain some sand? Although some just think they don’t need any salt at all. Which is even more profoundly idiotic.

    So where the hell are you getting iodine? Not from eggs (the yolk) and not free sea food (excepting seaweed?) and who eats sea weed daily? And apparently some dairy industries are moving away from using iodine for milking(to sanitize the teets.) another great source of iodine teetering on the edge of the abyss.

    Then you start putting this all together… And it sure makes a lot of sense why these people are mentally and physically ill.








  • More Perfect Union is award-winning independent journalism. Highly credible. YouTube takes down their videos occasionally and they usually get their lawyers to get them back up… So really the issue isn’t if they’re credible, but will YouTube continue to censor them, and they probably will…

    Their ideology would fit neatly into leftism/democratic socialism, IMO.





  • “Most toxic” depends on who’s annoyed this week, but there are a few recurring mental habits that reliably rot discourse without even trying.

    My biggest pet peeve is probably moral absolutism, often disguised as clarity. That’s the mindset where everything gets forced into clean categories of pure good vs pure evil, with zero tolerance for the rainbow of nuance.

    Next up is identity-as-proof. If someone is in Group X, then they must believe Y, and any counterexample is treated as an anomaly or betrayal. It saves effort because you don’t have to think, just sort people into bins and react accordingly.

    Then there’s algorithmic certainty syndrome, which is more modern and a bit more subtle. People get used to feeds that reinforce their priors so efficiently that disagreement starts to feel like statistical noise. So instead of updating beliefs, they just escalate confidence. Nothing says “epistemic humility” like being completely wrong with confidence.

    Another one is transactional morality: “If I’m right, I’m allowed to be as harsh as I want.” Which turns every disagreement into a license for cruelty, as if correctness automatically comes with behavioral immunity.

    And underneath a lot of it is something simpler and more disconcerting: comfort with not understanding things before judging them. People are so eager to tell others what they are by labeling them and defining them rather than simply talking about themselves (you… vs. I…)