Or maybe it’s just what the camera defaults to and they don’t bother changing it because why would you? Which is a more reasonable assumption than calling them delusional

We have machines that can do the work of 100 people in the past

I’m sure that we could make it work without killing anyone

Until lossy compression compresses it out because it’s not visible to the human eye

Lmao, people don’t need to stop being online to see and feel the problem. A lot fucking live it, feel it on their own, or a loved one’s, skin

I haven’t seen it, I’m younger than the movie and nobody really talked about it in any significant capacity

Some people just have unusual features

It’s not distance to mirror, it’s the focal length. The focal length of our eyes is static

Not a universal rule, however. Theres the whole concept of “optimizing yourself out of the fun” and what not in video games. Or the hardships being part of what makes a game fulfilling. It depends on what your goal is

But have you considered that the action of changing the time requires you to make a choice, get up, shift context, actually do it, then shift back, tiring you out?

This was made by the mental illness gang

(send help /j)

Really, we should just work towards keeping the world population stable and bring everyone out of poverty

Not that we have to try particularly hard, the population is stabilizing off by itself

We’re 8 billion people on the planet, we aren’t running out anytime soon

The anti-mirror test

Well, there’s a reason old ships had people high up as scouts. These days we just use radar and gps

Indeed, and the reason why I think the incompleteness theorems are the nail in the coffin, is that otherwise you could at least prove that certain sets of axioms worked together, then you’d have some basis for the math you use, even if it was self-referential

But it turns out that is impossible, and what we choose as our foundation for the math we use is pretty much arbitrary. Although of course we have reasons to use what we use

Godel’s second theory of incompleteness states that a formal system cannot prove its own consistency

I think that’s as close as you can get to “math is not objective”

We already know that math isn’t objective due to Godel’s incompleteness theorem

I do find it amazing that it was literally easier to send humans to the moon than faking it in 1969

Like, isn’t that an astonishing fact?

Where do you get that the train is completely empty? Look in the reflection, every seat is taken and people are standing

I will never understand gamers. Imagine thinking that being nice and respectful and have good sportsmanship is cringe

https://xkcd.com/1205/

It’s less effort and typically more realistic (in the sense that it looks more real, not that it is)

But it’s unethical either way, don’t make non-consensual porn