Just a smol with big opinions about AFVs and data science. The onlyfans link is a rickroll.
But for Israel they spontaneously forget them.
No you criticized her for her word usage in general, please do not try and present this like I said you were criticizing her for what she said during the 12 day war. She used the same terms used by trump to emphasize what she was responding to - and then repeatedly clarified in the body of the statement what it actually was. That’s a completely reasonable choice to make.
It’s an example of her using the specific language you’re criticizing her for not using in reference to the US and Israel attacking Iran. How on earth does that “not apply anymore”? It’s literally the exact thing you said she doesn’t do.
Did she say those exact words in this one statement? No. Has she condemned bombing iran as illegal in the past? yes.
She didn’t say the the exact phrase in this release, possibly because what you’re demanding was word-for-word already said by Mamdani in his condemnation. She describes it as illegal and repeatedly calls it a war, both in no uncertain terms, and has almost nailed the same phrase in the past the last time this happened.
No AI has perfect safeguards, but all the mainstream models will generally refuse requests for information about comitting suicide. They might encourage it thru indirect means or a question may avoid the safeguards, though, so it can only be described in general terms - generally they will not answer.
“Touch some grass”, if anyone else is unfamiliar with the tla. Rather rude, since that is not even slightly clear in the original meme and I appreciated the extra information…
Hey lets not forget Ghislaine Maxwell’s contributions to fascism here…
For sure! Decent people gotta stick up for each other on here, especially in the face of such prolific (and increasingly amusing) misinformation.
That person was also me, funnily enough!
since this is the copyright office it has no bearing on other types of established property such as license or patent law
Buddy, patents are public domain. That’s the whole point of a patent.
the office admits they are waiting for public input (the legislative body) on the matter
No they don’t - they’ve published their current rules and state that those rules are their interpretation and those rules will stand until and unless further rulings or legislation comes out to change the situation. You know, how laws work?
Being in the public domain means being there in perpetuity.
Nope!
It’s uncommon but public domain works can absolutely have their copyright restored.
No, it’s from wikipedia.
Not Copyrightable != Public Domain
Not being under copyright means it is in the public domain. That’s literally the entire definition.
The public domain is not a place. A work of authorship is in the “public domain” if it is no longer under copyright protection or if it failed to meet the requirements for copyright protection. Works in the public domain may be used freely without the permission of the former copyright owner.
invalidate the contract between the user.
Why do you keep bringing this up? Nobody else here cares and this claim isn’t in dispute - open source software can and is licensed all the time. That doesn’t change your initial claims about the output from Generative AI not being able to be held under copyright.
The only two examples in the text were AI Generated Images.
Man, it sure is weird how you ignore that they explicitly clarify that this applies to generated text too:
If a work’s traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship and the Office will not register it. For example, when an AI technology receives solely a prompt from a human and produces complex written, visual, or musical works in response, the “traditional elements of authorship” are determined and executed by the technology—not the human user.
God this is satisfying. Thank you for being like this.
Ah, thank you! But I’m afraid you may have the wrong idea: The Satanic Temple (which I am a part of) is in all but name a secular humanitarian organization - formed in opposition to the various religious authoritarian movements in the US. The trappings of satanism are only there to serve as a way to bait hypocrisy. I’m only interested in this topic from a cultural standpoint, as I’m not personally religious. I do appreciate the thought though!
Hey, so here’s the official opinion of the US copyright office on this matter.
If you look at this part right here:
“When an AI technology determines the expressive elements of its output, the generated material is not the product of human authorship. As a result, that material is not protected by copyright and must be disclaimed in a registration application.”
That’s where it says that right now, generative works are ineligible for copyright.
When an AI technology determines the expressive elements of its output, the generated material is not the product of human authorship.[31]
As a result, that material is not protected by copyright and must be disclaimed in a registration application.[32]
You already responded to it?
Aight and the proof already provided shows that it is in fact considered to be in the public domain, which proves you’re wrong.
You also did that, yes. However in the section I quoted, which I responded to with the above example, you criticized her and those like her for her word usage in general within this context.