• 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle
  • I don’t think value to society weighs into the equation, just the ratio of salary to ownership wealth gain.

    There are bad people in the working class that are a net detriment to society, just as there are good people in the owning class that are a net benefit. Those good and bad deeds don’t change how they accrue wealth and therefore don’t change their class.

    This working class isn’t a morality judgement, it’s a wealth ratio per individual.






  • Yondoza@sh.itjust.workstoLord of the memes@midwest.socialIf only...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Please correct me if I’m wrong. I was under the impression that according to official canon Isildur was traveling to seek Elrond’s council on what to do with the one ring when he was ambushed and killed and the ring lost.

    Edit: I’ll correct myself, I was wrong. He was on his way to Rivendel, but not to consult with Elrond about the ring. He was going to pick up his wife who stayed there during the assault on Mordor.










  • I heard a hypothesis that the first human made consciousness will be an AI algorithm designed to monitor and coordinate other AI algorithms which makes a lot of sense to me.

    Our consciousness is just the monitoring system of all our bodies subsystems. It is most certainly an emergent phenomenon of the interaction and management of different functions competing or coordinating for resources within the body.

    To me it seems very likely that the first human made consciousness will not be designed to be conscious. It also seems likely that we won’t be aware of the first consciousnesses because we won’t be looking for it. Consciousness won’t be the goal of the development that makes it possible.



  • A great point! I feel like the overarching end goal is a meritocracy - people are rewarded for their talents and hard work. I’d wager most people agree with this goal.

    The problem becomes disentangling history and circumstance from our ability to measure talent and hard work. The only way we know to break some social norms that hinder a true meritocracy is to unfairly manipulate the playing field in the short term, which in itself does not follow a meritocracy.

    I think there are a few main obstacles:

    1. Perceived talent and hard work that was actually the result of circumstance - those that think the system is currently working and therefore their position is justified.
    2. Lack of acceptance that the goal is long term / generational. Those that are unwilling to accept a temporary ‘manipulated meritocracy’ in the short term that would allow a better one in the future.

  • Yondoza@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlBlockchain: the wave of the future
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The perfect use case is tickets to live events. One entity creates one NFT for each seat or spot available and can initially sell them. The owner of that NFT (ticket) can then do whatever they want with it without the need for a third party (Ticketmaster) to scalp the shit out of any subsequent transactions.

    Proof of ownership of a single ticket at the time of the event is the end goal, which is what NFTs do.

    Why this hasn’t been done is pretty baffling to me.

    What’s better, is if artists want to provide a subset of tickets that are not resellable they can. Those tickets will only be accepted if a single transaction has taken place.