fubarx@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoWhen in Rome...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square68linkfedilinkarrow-up1798arrow-down15
arrow-up1793arrow-down1imageWhen in Rome...lemmy.worldfubarx@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square68linkfedilink
minus-squareanswersplease77@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoso he updated his script, or fixed a bug while driving, right?
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoSomeone else wrote some code, and he reviewed it and approved it, and merged it into the codebase.
minus-squareKubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoOh I would hope not, it’s good practice to not let the person writing the code merge it in, to get a fresh pair of eyes on the code before it goes in. Though in a way you could say he “fixed a bug” by merging a bugfix written by somebody else, but that feels like a failure of attribution.
so he updated his script, or fixed a bug while driving, right?
Someone else wrote some code, and he reviewed it and approved it, and merged it into the codebase.
Oh I would hope not, it’s good practice to not let the person writing the code merge it in, to get a fresh pair of eyes on the code before it goes in.
Though in a way you could say he “fixed a bug” by merging a bugfix written by somebody else, but that feels like a failure of attribution.