• TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not that sure that history will give a shit about US American Democrats or US American Republicans.

    Those labels will be lost. “US American” concentration camps, disappearing citizens, ignoring court orders, death squads … there will be no “oh that was just the Republicans”; it will be “oh that was just the Americans”.

    • RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Partly… Look at the original Nazis. The nazi part is usually added to make the distinction with different periods - but for that period, the whole nation is referred to as nazi Germany.

  • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not even generate a candidate that doesn’t support genocide, it’s literally just not stand in the way of or conspire against such a candidate, but naturally the DNC and their controlled opposition functionaries can’t even manage to do the right thing by doing nothing at all.

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      new dnc chair totally promises they won’t this time, please pay no attention to their constant and immediate attacks on anyone in dnc trying to move the party left or learn from 2024

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mamdani: “Hey, people really seem to resonate with this message and will hand you an easy, landslide win.”

      DNC, publicly: “How about you go fuck yourself?”

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe we don’t deserve a country if we can’t elect a non corrupt person (from either side).

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, the DNC supports genocide. Trump is worse, which is really a testament to how phenomally bad he is for just about everyone on the planet. I want progressive democrats on the ballot, but I’m not holding my breath. I’m still going to vote, and I’m going to vote for the least bad option.

      • Faraiwe@mstdn.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        @themeatbridge yep

        voting is not a marriage proposal, it’s a chess move towards a better future.

        I still want everyone at the DNC leadership to choke and die, soonest.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          it’s a chess move towards a better future.

          The expected move from progressives is always “forfeit.”

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          chess moves implies control and voting for the lesser evil isn’t a strategic move; it’s just hoping that the piece you think you’re forced to move does the least amount of damage.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        voting for any non-progressive candidate perpetuates this system that’s controlled by baby raping/eating/killing oligarchic billionaires.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not voting for any candidate because none of them are progressive enough perpetuates the same system. How are you helping by not voting for the lesser evil?

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Politics is a spectrum, and theoretically there is a candidate even for you that would still support genocide and also be progressive enough to earn your vote.

              Edit: Yes, downvote me, but tell me who you voted for in the most recent election at any level, and I’ll point to the genocide they supported.

              Edit 2: Lot of people telling me progressive candidates are on every ballot, but nobody has yet to name a single candidate. One person mentioned a party that fielded three total candidates nationwide in all races in the 2024 election, one of whom was a Presidential candidate that could not mathematically win because she wasn’t on enough ballots. Most Americans were unable to find her name on their ballot, and the overwhelming majority of Americans did not have any PSL representation on their ballots at any level.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Politics is a spectrum, and theoretically there is a candidate even for you that would still support genocide and also be progressive enough to earn your vote.

                Theoretically there’s a progressive who supports genocide hard enough to get your vote.

                • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You’re telling me you’ve never voted for a candidate that supports the current Israeli genocide? Are you not an American?

          • orc girly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I believe you can make the case for either option (lesser evil or third party) and either is definitely better than not voting, but I’m of the view that voting is a negligible part of our political involvement that gets too much attention, organizing is a lot more necessary and effective, otherwise things will never improve

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Absolutely this is a critical point. If you want better candidates, create them. Forge them and support them. Attend townhalls and demand answers from candidates. That’s the time to shape the race. Once you enter the voting booth, it’s far too late to try to fix everything with one choice.

              I like the quote from Gandhi, “Whatever you do in life will be insignificant but it is very important that you do it…” I think that applies to voting. One vote may be insignificant, or it may be everything. You won’t know, and you may never know for sure. But if you don’t vote, it is definitely nothing.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thats precisely what the DNC counts on when they ratfuck progressives. The only reason we got Biden to step down and Kamala to pick Walz was the DNC couldn’t delude themselves into thinking they could win. Once Kamala’s popularity spiked and they told themselves the left, black people, and/or women would do as they are told, they went back to business as usual.

        We need to be screaming from now to 2028 that any candidate who does not support free healthcare, abolition of ICE, and zero weapons for Israel is unelectable.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          We need to be screaming from now to 2028 that any candidate who does not support free healthcare, abolition of ICE, and zero weapons for Israel is unelectable.

          The DNC does not care if their candidate is electable. They only care that their candidate is not a progressive.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The only reason Biden stepped down when he did was that the DNC wanted to avoid a primary they knew Kamala wouldn’t win. They waited until she was the only viable candidate. It wasn’t delusion, it was strategy. It was terrible strategy, but I also think that’s part of the strategy. We didn’t “get” Biden to step down. We failed to get rid of him soon enough for it to matter.

          The problem is that there aren’t enough voters who support free healthcare, abolition of ICE, and zero weapons for Israel. We need leadership to make the argument for those policies, and those leaders are simply lacking. There are more every day, and I will fight with everything I have to support them, but they are going to keep losing for a while. Our fight is long, and we plant the trees that will shade our decendents when we are long buried. And in the meantime, there will be an election, and you will make a choice. Choose something you can live with, because it will have an impact on the world. If you choose not to participate, you are still equally responsible for the outcome.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            there aren’t enough voters who support free healthcare, abolition of ICE, and zero weapons for Israel

            Nah, that requires intentionally misleading polls. Ask someone on the street “Do you think healthcare should be free” or even “should every single american have healthcare” and you will get overwhelming agreement. To get people to disagree you have to do bullshit like “Do you want the government to take away your health insurance” or something. Same with abolition of ICE and weapons for Israel. The only people who want ICE coming to their neighborhood and dragging off their neighbors or Israel bombing brown people are never going to vote dem.

            There are no voters who will vote for means-tested subsidies for insurance companies that you buy through 1 of 50 online marketplaces or through your employer, but won’t vote for free healthcare.

            There is a shitton of voters who will vote for free healthcare, but will assume whatever compromised centrist solution the neolibs come up with will not help them.

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              “Do you think healthcare should be free?” is not the same question as “Do you care enough about free healthcare to vote for a candidate who supports it?” Voters are largely uninformed, unengaged, and only rarely do more than show up to vote if they bother to do that.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                The number of people who will show up for free healthcare is greater than the number who will show up for complicated tax credits for PEL grant recipients who operate a business in an under-served neighborhood for 5 years and were born on a prime numbered date, and make between 20 and 40K/year and submit 12 pages of paperwork.

                Hell when I was phone-banking for Biden in 2020, half the people I was contacted listed free healthcare and freeing the ICE camps as reasons they were going to vote.

                They thought they were voting for progressive policy, the opposite of that happened. Further disengagement is expected result of not doing everything in your power to help your base.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Further disengagement is expected result of not doing everything in your power to help your base.

                  The DNC thinks its base is netanyahu and two cheneys. Well, one cheney now.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How the fuck would the dnc generate a lefty candidate? Thats like asking the circus to generate something other than a clown.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am reminded of two quotes from Fear And Loathing On The Campaign Trail '72 by Hunter S. Thompson:

    How many more of these stinking, double-downer sideshows will we have to go through before we can get ourselves straight enough to put together some kind of national election that will give me and the at least 20 million people I tend to agree with a chance to vote FOR something, instead of always being faced with that old familiar choice between the lesser of two evils?

    Jesus! Where will it end? How low do you have to stoop in this country to be President?

    How low? Now, I guess we know. Voting for the lesser evil for 50 years has got you Trump. Twice. How much lower are you going to go?

    I have no solutions. Things will probably have to break completely before the mending can begin.

  • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man, you really just have to post “I refuse to support genocide” to bring the blue maga nazis out of the woodwork.

    It’s very simple: I refuse to support genocide.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      And genocide marches on, entirely unaffected by your lack of support. Good thing there weren’t any other policies “blue maga” differed on, right?

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Prefacing a statement deserving of valid criticism with an assertion that critics are bad does not make the criticism invalid.

          • m532@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh no, your empire, the one with the “other policies”, just attacked iran bipartisanly

              • m532@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Of course you don’t give a shit about other countries. Defending the holy DNC while they are mass murdering.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Who is the DNC mass murdering right now? The government is controlled by Republicans right now. The Democrats losing the election did not end the genocide in Gaza, in many ways it’s gotten even worse. And now Republicans are doing additional terrible things that the Democrats would not have done.

                  You care more about posturing and virtue signaling your purity than you care about other countries. Everything is worse now but at least you didn’t compromise.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        sure, they only massively deported brown people, started wars, helped genociders etc…
        As long as none of those democratic ‘other policies’ targeted white americans you kept your mouth shut. you deserve this, and more.
        fuck all you scumbags

  • Pissed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    After working for the DNC for free for years and most of my calls being right, they can suck my fucking dick never again the amount of fucking consulting fees other people squeezed out of those pricks meanwhile I’m basically unemployable because of my politics, I’m not even a fucking american.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If the electoral system only lets you choose leaders who don’t align with the majority, it’s not a democracy. It’s a dictatorship with extra steps.

  • guldukat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    At this point staying home helps Trump. It’s the fucking reason he’s there. Trump votes stayed consistent with 2020 but Dems votes dropped by millions. You saying Harris would be just as bad? This view is pushed by billionaires to help get fascists elected.

    • Salamence@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Top Democratic officials who worked on the party’s still-secret autopsy of the 2024 election concluded that Kamala Harris lost significant support because of the Biden administration’s approach to the war in Gaza, Axios has https://web.archive.org/web/20260223002443/https://www.axios.com/2026/02/22/dnc-2024-autopsy-harris-gaza

      Wow, maybe dont run pro-genocide candidates if you want your base to Vote for you? Or do you think the cult-like devotion of the republicans is a positive democrats should follow?

      • ikirin@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then again what is the other Option? Not vote for either candidate like in 2024 and let Trump win?

        I’m not a US citizen but I still act similar in my local elections - vote for the candidate that will do less evil when they’re in office, if there is no better option. And I gotta hand it to the DNC they’re really amazing at just cutting off their own legs. Because shooting themselves in the knee can’t describe this.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Then again what is the other Option?

          Insane levels of Stockholm syndrome on display. “It puts the genocide on the skin, or else it gets the Trump again.”

          What should the German people have done when Hitler rose to power? Knowing what we know now, what would have been the best “option” for them?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then again what is the other Option? Not vote for either candidate like in 2024 and let Trump win?

          You’re the guy in the meme. So devoted to genocide that you can’t imagine a better option.

          • ikirin@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not devoted to genocide - but rather when wanting better candidate (a real socialist candidate that does not support the war machine) but instead getting a sock puppet I’d rather try to have the sock puppet instead of letting worse people win.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              You have two years to get a candidate that doesn’t support the genocide you totally aren’t devoted to.

              Try not to be the guy in the meme in your reply.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      approximately 10 million and the dems still refuses to change their game, but it’ll be worse next time because of epstein and iran… in addition to gaza.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They will be shown as many times as it takes for you to demand better than blue hitler

          • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ok. Enjoy your trump then. All of it. All were saying is right the boat first, then fix the problem. Guess hitting the iceberg is an ‘acceptable loss’.

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You think genocide of the Other is an acceptable price to pay to delay having to fight fascism. You have rolled over and collaborated with the nazis because resistance is unfathomable to you. You are a nazi collaborator, and no amount of projecting that guilt will change what you signed your name to.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          it’s not about retribution, it’s about complicity w genocides; wars for profit; and baby raping/killing/eating.

          people are slowly becoming disaffected and now there’s so many who won’t participate that aren’t enough 3rd party voters to make up the difference.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              they’re not stupid, they’re disaffected and ignoring why they’re disaffected will lead to more people not voting.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You’re so devoted to genocide that you long ago learned that it’s a losing issue, but refuse to abandon it anyway.

  • SuDmit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Rhetorical: Omg again? With same exact picture? In not really political comm?

    (Disclaimer: not US citizen)

    Go and vote in primaries for candidates you want, so maybe you get someone decent (so “no matter who” part is eliminated), apply pressure to them right now. Until you have enough power and support to create new party from scratch (and have it catch third of population instantly somehow, including republicans) or overthrow current system altogether, you have to work within it.

    Also: in famous thought experiment, named Trolley problem, do you call yourself murderer (genocider) if you decide to push the lever?

    I myself had different and conflicted opinions during those years, arguments for voting blue and third party (or abstaining) both look quite convincing, at least for not well versed in politics me. Ugh.

    Looking forward to mod award on this post.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    ‘Lol but everyone knows midterms and primaries arent important!’

    (Proceeds to complain about quality of candidates during the presidential)

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      ‘Lol but everyone knows midterms and primaries arent important!’

      You sure beat the shit out of that strawman. If you’d had primaries in 2024, we might not be in this mess.