President Donald Trump’s administration is quietly pushing to dramatically scale back hunting restrictions across national parks, refuges, and wilderness areas, raising questions about visitor safety and wildlife impact. This initiative follows a January order from U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, directing agencies to remove what he termed “unnecessary regulatory or administrative barriers” to hunting and fishing, and to justify any regulations they wish to maintain. Burgum stated, “Expanding opportunities for the public to hunt and fish on Department-managed lands not only strengthens conservation outcomes, but also supports rural economies, public health, and access to America’s outdoor spaces.” He added, “The Department’s policy is clear: public and federally managed lands should be open to hunting and fishing unless a specific, documented, and legally supported exception applies.”
The hunting restriction was one of the things that allowed the American bison (our unofficial second national animal) to came back from near extinction. This is a serious step backwards for conservation. Imagine all the other animals that might go extinct from this relaxation of hunting restrictions.
Including relaxing restrictions around hunting near trails. Which is to say near hikers.
I hope the eggs are doing alright
Motherfucker hunters better stay the fuck out Yellowstone. I get shot at and going beat that person to death with their own rifle.
There should never be hunting in a National Park.
I know this is a joke but you wouldn’t come within 50ft of that person as they’d claim it was self defense to shoot you dead.
Personally, though, many people who hunt probably wouldn’t hunt at a national park IMO because there risk of other non hunters being there. Normally, iirc hunting has policies to signal you’re a person (like wearing orange while hunting deer).
I’m personally not a hunter, but we own firearms; and I believe anyone who’s afraid to use them, or hates on them is in for a rude awakening. This country built in the right to own them to protect ourselves from our government because they understood that people with power lust for more power, and we’ll likely need a reset in the future because of this. Learn to protect yourselves! Your way of life and your life will depend on it someday.
Many years a ago a conservation officer was called to a small, rather unknown state park we have here. The call was because someone was poaching on the land. The poacher shot the CO dead. He also was not convicted.
https://www.odmp.org/officer/15179-conservation-officer-james-v-spignesi-jr
It says private field, but They renamed the state park, so perhaps the field was the one that borders the park.
Ohhh shit! That’s so sad! And there fact he wasn’t convicted because no real way to prove?! How about ballistics, powder residue on the shooter’s hand, or an approximate match of the size/weight of the round (though very well could’ve not been recovered if it went through).
The shooter argued it was an accident, he thought the CO was a deer, and …was let off.
The benefit of a rifle is that you can do what ya gotta do from more than 50ft away. Now we just have to come up with some sort of signal to differentiate between who’s in Yellowstone to hunt deer and who’s there to hunt the hunters.
Well, true on the 50ft, but you couldn’t rightfully shoot someone at 200ft+ and claim defense, because you’d have had enough time to leave or get away from the situation. Many self defense scenarios are judged on the defender being in fear for their lives or at risk of great or grave bodily harm to themselves or a loved one.
I think most sane people wouldn’t hunt at national parks because of a respect for others, unless maybe an invasive species went open season to save other species or plants.
Hunters aren’t itching to hunt anywhere and everywhere they can. Unless maybe you’re some wealthy big game hunter for sport and not respect of the animal. Maybe that’s why they’re relaxing regulations, for Trump & Co’s wealthy friends to expand their trophy collections… 🙄
I wasn’t suggesting shooting them in self defense, but in defense of the wildlife in the park. I’d say that in addition to the trophy hunters there’s no shortage of yahoos that would jump at the chance to hunt in a place like Yellowstone because of the ease. The wildlife there is not tame but it is habituated to human presence, they do not behave like animals in areas where hunting has been allowed for years. It’s be like shooting fish in a barrel for the first couple of seasons until they remembered they needed to scatter. And then the magic that is Yellowstone is gone. The landscapes remain beautiful but there’s no wildlife to be seen existing in it, they fled when they heard your approach.
Adopting the Kenyan game warden policy of shooting poachers? I’m in.
Future generations: “Gramps, are you saying they drove species into extinction to own the libs? Can you explain again what that means?”
Rents too high, go outside! There you may try to hide!
I’m just going to assume the goal here is hunting humans.
May or may not be the goal, but a shot hiker is the inevitable result
Let’s get some government legislators and C-suite executives out there in those parks! The beauty is to die for!
But only in season - the school year.
It’ll be pretty easy. The big game hunters wear bright orange.
If they follow the rules
Hunger Games here we come.
Dick Cheney liked this 👍🏻
F This! When are we going to start hunting these pedophiles and their brainwashed cucks?
deleted by creator
I live near a national historic park in a suburban area. They have struggled with deer overpopulation since we have basically no predators left in our area.
A few times a year they have sharpshooters doing deer culls after hours, and it’s helped a lot, you see some of those ripple effects where since the deer aren’t eating all the vegetation you’re seeing more and different kinds of plants returning which has brought back populations of other animals that used to be pretty uncommon.
And the deer are generally healthier with less competition from each other, I remember seeing a lot of sickly-looking deer there when I was a kid and I don’t see that as much anymore.
But even though the culls have helped, there’s still a bit of an overpopulation problem, and allowing some hunting could help with that, and maybe eliminate the need to pay sharpshooters for culling. We have other, similar-sized parks in our area where hunting is allowed with few to no issues and in this part of the state you’re basically limited to bows and shotguns which helps to limit how far a stray shot could go.
I wouldn’t want the whole park to be opened to hunting all through hunting season, but I think allowing it in certain parts of the bark on certain days could be very beneficial.
This occupation isn’t known for oversight nor competency. Expect any changes to be implemented in the worst possible way.
Oh absolutely, I have 0 faith in this administration to do this in any kind of remotely sensible way
But in general, with different people at the helm, I could really get behind more hunting opportunities in national parks as a conservation tool.
Really I’d like to see predators like wolves reintroduced, but that’s not going to happen anytime soon, and realistically for it to work in the parks around me that I have in mind for this we’d probably need to bulldoze and reforest huge swathes of suburbia to support those predators, so nothing that’s going to happen in a hurry, even if we somehow got the people living there to agree to move or eminent domained their properties (which isn’t going to happen) we’d probably be looking at years if not decades just to replant and regrow the forests.
