• ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think my biggest pet peeve about driving is when you come to a stop and the car behind you tries to shove their nose up your ass. Like bruh you don’t need to ever be that close

    • OR3X@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Especially annoying if you’re driving a manual and are stopped on an incline.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I drive a 6 speed. This is where my rage for this comes from.

        But even in automatics rollback isn’t uncommon on an incline.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I feel like it really isn’t your fault if you role back 6 inches and hit them. If you were to roll back 4 feet it would be different but in this case you can’t control something so small.

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            In court it won’t be your fault if they’re that close, but it’s still the hassle of dealing with people who don’t understand basic driving etiquette.

        • OR3X@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I can usually set off on an incline with no rollback but I’ll be damn if it doesn’t slightly stress me out every time someone pulls that shit.

    • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My driving instructor taught me that I should still be able to see the other car’s back wheels when I stop. I actually don’t know how close that looks from the other driver’s perspective.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Terrible, terrible advice. That leaves a full car-length of empty pavement with the driver sight-lines of modern SUV and crossover designs. Pickup trucks are worse; I’ve seen pickup truck drivers stop a full 30 feet back. It wastes huge amounts of space on the street, and causes traffic congestion. On the other side of the coin, van and bus drivers can still get right up on your ass when following this advice.

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I hate breathing in pollution so I keep a car’s length between me and the next car at traffic lights. Cars themselves are a huge storming waste of space and I hate being in or around cars with all my heart and soul so if I make traffic worse then I will consider it a passive form of protesting against car dependency

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What it looks like:

        1000005472

        Not actually as the “see the tires” rule is fairly good advise. Keep in mind sometimes it is smarter to give a little more space depending on the situation. Think of it as more of a minimum. Also lose most of your speed farther back and then role forward. This allows for recovery time in case of failure or loss of traction.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      At a stop? Who cares? Can’t being closer together at a stop light at least help with intersections? I guess it depends on the city.

      If you’re driving a manual and you roll back on a stop, you shouldn’t be driving a manual. Unless you live in like San Francisco I guess? In the Appalachian region, cops will stop you for rolling back.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ever heard of clear distance? If you’re at a stop and someone rear ends you and you hit the car in front of you you are at fault and will be held liable.

        As for the rollback in my state they’ll again look at distance. Because if I don’t have enough space to back up because you’re too close you’re once again at fault for not having clear distance.

        On top of all that it helps move traffic along faster. You don’t have to wait as long to accelerate if you maintain distance because you don’t have to wait for the car in front of you to move far enough to start accelerating.

        Getting bumper to bumper has zero benefits outside of the false psychological feeling of forward progress.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      if they are following the two second rule they should be less than a foot from your car. If your car is stopped you are always more than two seconds from the car in front of you.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        So you can hit the car in front of you too?

        It’s not only a safety hazard but it leads to slower traffic. If you maintain the right distance at a stop the whole line of cars can accelerate faster because you don’t have to wait as long for the car ahead of you to move. There are zero actual benefits of sniffing my ass at a stop.