Johnnei's World
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
baggachipz@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前

Talk good

i.imgflip.com

message-square
44
link
fedilink
565

Talk good

i.imgflip.com

baggachipz@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前
message-square
44
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • craftyindividual@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 年前

    “irregardless”

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 年前

    • squilox@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 年前

      Irregardely

      • general_kitten@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 年前

        irregarlably

        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 年前

          Urrgrrrbbll

  • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 年前

    Ostensedly

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 年前

    Mayhaps.

    Possentially.

    • FMT99@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 年前

      Perchance

      • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 年前

        tips fedora

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 年前

    exasturbate

    • 15liam20@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 年前

      What do you mean?

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 年前

  • BibiTofu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 年前

    Well shit. I never knew what “ostensibly” meant. I thought it was a direct equivalent to the French “ostensiblement”. And apparently so does Google Translate.

    Except that the definition of “ostensiblement” is “Not hidden, done with the intention to be seen”. Which is not at all the English meaning. So now I wonder what’s an accurate English translation for “ostensiblement”…

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 年前

      “Not hidden, done with the intention to be seen”. Which is not at all the English meaning.

      It sort of fits the English definition, because it’s often used in the context of deception: a person could ostensibly think one thing but actually believe another. The thing they ostensibly think is the thing they intend to be seen, while their true feelings remain hidden.

  • lars@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 年前

    It is a word, it’s just often misused.¹


    1. m-w.com/grammar/supposably-vs-supposedly
    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 年前

      One could suppose.

      • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 年前

        This is news to Us.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 年前

      It is indeed a word.

    • Affine Connection@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 年前

      much like “therefor”, which does not mean the same thing as “therefore”

      • TheLemming@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 年前

        Wat

  • StinkyDave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 年前

    Prolly

  • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 年前

    In tents, if porpoises

    • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 年前

      Ginormous

  • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 年前

    No u.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 年前

    Purportedly!

  • UnhingedFridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 年前

    deleted by creator

  • Mossheart@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 年前

    “Allegedly”

    • mpa92643@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 年前

      “Allegably”

  • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 年前

    If you know what they mean, who cares? Does it give you an erection to “correct” people when literally everyone knows what the person means? You’re not winning any brownie points being a wannabe middle school English teacher. You’re just an insufferable twat.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 年前

      El Guapo, I know that I, Jefe, do not have your superior intellect and education, but could it be that once again, you are angry at something else, and are looking to take it out on me?

      – Jefe, ¡Three Amigos!

    • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 年前

      When you keep speaking wrong*, it indicates that you have no regard for being understood, and hence you don’t give a rat’s ass about a) your listeners and b) your language. Meaning you’re an insufferable twat.

      • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 年前

        A total of zero people are confused when someone says “supposably” instead of “supposedly.” All you think about is how you or someone else you know was corrected and made fun for speaking “wrong.”

        Also, “correcting” peoples pronunciations has a deep-rooted history in oppressing minority groups, e.g. “ask” vs. “axe.” You’d know this if you weren’t full of so much hate and ignorance.

        • D_C@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 年前

          Them- “btw, you’ve pronounced that word incorrectly.”
          You- “THAT’S RACIST. You are full of hate and ignorance!”

          • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 年前

            You’re not an English teacher, right? You’re not speaking to your kids, right? You’re just having regular conversations with people, right? If you want to beat rules into people who don’t speak like you do, you might actually be full of hate and ignorance and you’re probably racist, that is 100% correct.

            • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 年前

              deleted by creator

              • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 年前

                It’s about context, my guy. As a non-native speaker, you’re probably not making the same English speaking “mistakes” as natives. If you’re correcting native speakers about English as a non-native, you’re probably going to be more often wrong than right, and since you don’t know societal context, that’s really bad too. You people have to stop dumbing shit down and ignoring all the context with everything.

                • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 年前

                  deleted by creator

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 年前

    Genuine question: why do people care? The goal of language is to communicate and if you understand what the other person said then they’ve done that

    • Affine Connection@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 年前

      Wye due pupil cairn what wards ah yews wren the pronoun serration is clothes and off two yonder sandwich wards amen two yews wrens pea king allowed.

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 年前

        Thank you for providing evidence in my favor by communicating an idea with words near the edge of incoherence. Obviously there’s a spectrum here between near misses and totally breakdown of language. But this is Lemmy so let’s jump the gun and not give people the consideration we would if we spoke to them to their face. I’m talking about how all the examples people have been providing are near misses that are very clearly communicating the same thing as a “correct” word. People aren’t stupid for using them, you’re an asshole for being irritated by it

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 年前

      Because “supposably” is not a goddamn word, so it shouldn’t be used to communicate. We live in a society

      • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 年前

        You know what also wasn’t a word?

        Literally every word that is now a word.

        • 15liam20@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 年前

          Word

      • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 年前

        Supposebly is a word though…

        https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/supposably-vs-supposedly

      • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 年前

        We live in a society smh my head every time

      • nevial@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 年前

        It is, though?

    • nevial@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 年前

      Genuine answer: because it makes language less accurate and if you have to infer what the other person is trying to say (instead of what they are actually saying) that is just unnecessary energy wasted and it WILL create misunderstandings eventually. Disclaimer: I know this is about accurately using language, but as English is not my first language, this comment might not be entirely accurate itself, lol. But I am observing similar situations like the one this post is about in my first language (German) as well

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.32K users / day
  • 2.99K users / week
  • 6.85K users / month
  • 16.3K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 55.5K subscribers
  • 15.4K Posts
  • 323K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.18
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org