• DUMBASS@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    We had one that had a really long cord on it and when my older sisters would walk into another room with it, I’d run up and unplug it from the base then disappear. Fuck I had some good hiding spots.

  • SSNs4evr@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Slam it so hard you could make it ding. If you were still mad, you could then yank the cord out of the wall. If you still weren’t done, you could throw it across the room, and it would be just fine, when you calmed down, plugged it back in, and set it on the table again.

  • monotremata@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    And the ringer in the phone was a physical bell with a little magnetically-actuated hammer, so if you slammed the receiver down hard enough, the bell would actually resonate for a little while after. You know how some people use a bell slowly fading out as a meditation tool? That’s the association I have for that sensation.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      “You know how some people use a bell slowly fading out as a meditation tool? That’s the association I have for that sensation.”

      Oh man, this comparison is going to stick with me; it’s one of my favourite things I’ve read in recent weeks

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks! I debated whether to include it, because it’s definitely one of those “well my brain sure isn’t normal!” things, but now I’m glad I did.

  • Gismonda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    This was so unbelievably satisfying….Fuck you! SLAM … brrring …SLAM … brrring … over and over again

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 days ago

      Answering on flip phones was equally boss. When you master that perfect wrist flip where you can just crack the hinge a little with your thumb and let the flip do the rest of the work.

      So satisfying every time.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The older startacs where you could whip if out of a pocket and wrist flip it open without fear of ending up with a 2 piece phone

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Like straight down? On what kind of surface?

      I spiked the fuck out of an old Nokia in like 2093 against the carpeted floor in my office. Sadly I slightly cracked the corner of where the battery case met the phone. The phone still worked but the battery wouldn’t stay connected. Sometimes I feel like I’m the only person on the internet who ever broke a Nokia.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got the 2024 moto razr+ flr my work phone when ATT had it on sale for almost nothing since nobody was buying them

    I’d forgotten how satisfying it was to hang up by snapping the phone shut.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      AFAIK, one reason for that is that AT&T was the monopoly provider of telephone equipment. They didn’t have to compete with anybody who might undercut them for price. In addition, people often rented their phones, paying a small rental charge every month. That meant that AT&T built the phones to last. They were extremely solid because AT&T didn’t ever want to have to replace a phone that someone was renting.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nowadays, we see the answer to the question “What if we made the hinges plastic?” in almost everything we do, everywhere we go.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was speaking generally of most consumer goods that have cheapened on design and materials, but to address phones…

          While the material of the shell was plastic, there were huge differences in both shape, density (bakelite has different compressive properties than polyurethane) as well as engineering.

          IE, the shells of lets say, and old 1985 motel phone, were made of pretty thick bakelite or poly plastic, and the insides were made of very simple metal and copper wiring, there were no integrated circuits, there were no moving parts, no computers, no video screens, no charging ports, no boards with parts, they were almost entirely mechanical, the function of the keys only served to send signal tones and didn’t connect to anything more advanced than a switchboard somewhere. That’s why they could withstand a lot of abuse.

          Modern electronics, including the rare home landline phones we have now, are made of much thinner polyurethane or styrene shells, they have almost entirely solid-state parts inside, chips and boards that capacitors can come loose from, charging ports that can break off the housing and make shorts in connections, wiring isn’t designed to withstand someone accidentally yanking the whole thing, they have LCD screens and are basically just more fragile in all regards.

          The issue has a lot more to do with the wider array of consumer goods though, like vacuum cleaners or microwave ovens and home goods that are supposed to last for years and years, but tend to break after only a couple years, and this is now by design.

          • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            no moving parts

            Mechanical bells in phones were nice. If you slammed the phone on the receiver you would get a nice ring from them.

            People also didn’t own the phones themselves. They were usually rented from the phone company as part of the service contract. So the phone companies had an incentive to buy sturdy equipment. Consumers buying things for themselves often buy the cheapest they can, resulting in lower quality. Yes, lots of products today are worse than they could be, consumer demand for cheap devices plays a role here as well.

            microwave ovens

            There are only a handful of companies making the core component magnetrons. Various brands just package it differently.

            My Bosch vacuum cleaner is 11 years old and works great. The only problem it has is weaker cable retraction. My Bosch washing machine is 7 years old and works fine. My Samsung fridge is 5 years old and great. My Miele dishwasher is at least 15 years old and works great. My no name brand cheap toaster is 17 years old and works great. So from personal experience, I think this is acceptable.

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I never had a microwave magnetron give out, they last far longer than the plastic housing, plastic handles, hollow frames and thin plastic films over the buttons. I’ve also lost five vacuum cleaners of various brands in the last decade, full on smoke and melted plastic. Only Dyson has lasted more than a decade.

              And I also realized that by discussing the durability of branded houseware, I am absolutely too old to be on the internet anymore.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you had a Touch Tone phone, you could hold any button while on a call and the noise would annoy sales callers, or the creepy heavy breathers that would call.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, each button was a combination of 2 frequencies, each row and each column had a certain frequency. So, each button was a combination of those two.

      But, if you pushed two buttons on the same row, or two buttons in the same column, you could get a single “note”. So, you could play very basic tunes.

  • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Boomer moment: I’m 30 but never got used to the feeling of modern smartphones against out ears. It’s terrible and I can never hear or be heard well enough. It’s to a point where I always answer in speakerphone or with headphones, facilitated by not answering the phone often. Recently I’ve been wishing to get an old phone-like accessory for my smartphone so I could do calls in a comfortable way.

    … Then again, during covid I learned to answer phones around the lab on speakerphone, too, and these were classic-style phones. So maybe I’m a lost cause

    Edit: old cellphones were fine, it’s just smartphones that have the worst possible shape and texture to hold them against my ear. Sadly, my parents still see that as the primary use for a phone.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m 30 but never got used to the feeling of modern smartphones against out ears.

      I’m almost 5 decades into this weird mess and yeah, I still am not that comfortable with sliding a cold, smooth, oily, touch-screen with all kinds of sensitive buttons and screen options across my ear when having a phone call. I’ve always hated it compared to the comfort of an old corded-phone speaker that was pleasantly curved for privacy and had a solid, comfortable handle. You could throw that thing against the wall, drop it while you’re talking, set it down for an hour and forget about it (for those kinds of calls.)

      On the other hand, I almost never get phone calls anymore. People straight up stopped calling each other. I get maybe one a week at work, but even there most calls are scheduled Teams or Zoom calls. People hate talking to each other given the choice, everyone has withdrawn to a world of text messages and private discord servers.

      Not saying things were better in the old days, but this is a major factor in our societal de-socialization crisis.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wonder if there’s anybody that’s comfortable with slab-style phones being used as phones.

        If you’re over a certain age, you grew up with proper telephone handsets. Even early cell phones had a vaguely ergonomic shape. Like, the original Motorola Razr didn’t open to 180 degrees, and had a “chin” near the bottom so you could get good contact with your ear while keeping your mouth near the microphone.

        Then there’s people under a certain age who grew up with texting, instant messages, etc. For them, it’s not the shape that’s an issue, it’s that using a phone as a phone that’s odd. They’d much rather do anything other than voice calls.

        Not saying things were better in the old days, but this is a major factor in our societal de-socialization crisis.

        Nah, I completely disagree with that. I think phones were always a terrible means of communication, but they were the most used thing for a while because we didn’t have anything better for communication at a distance. Phones force you into an audio-only form of communication where you don’t get gestures, facial expression, or a moving mouth to watch. That cuts out a lot of the nuance of the communication. In addition, it’s immediate so there’s no time to think and interpret what someone is trying to say. It’s also initiated by the caller and the callee has to drop whatever they’re doing and respond immediately. It’s just bad.

        Video calls with something like Facetime have some of those issues. The positive is that you get facial expressions and some body language as cues The downside is that it’s still expected that you respond immediately. But, it seems like there’s a convention to ask before doing a video call, or to schedule one. That means you’re generally not pulled into a conversation when you’re not ready. Even more so with video meetings like Zoom, where they’re almost never spontaneous, and always scheduled ahead of time. Phone calls are often spontaneous, and can catch someone at a terrible time.

        Text messages in some ways are even worse than phone calls, because you don’t even get tone of voice or volume as cues to what someone means. OTOH, they’re not as immediate. Sure, sometimes you’re watching the little chat bubbles waiting for a response. But, the asynchronous nature of that kind of chat means there’s still a bit of a chance to think before you respond.

        IMO, people of all ages abandoned phone calls because phone calls are just bad. Much better are either asynchronous ways of communicating where you can take a chance to think before you respond, or high-bandwidth forms of communication involving video where you can see gestures, facial expressions, etc.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah to me it’s weird that phones are flat slabs now. That whole concept would have looked stupid in the 80s or even the 90s.

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Exactly, I say modern cell phones are “phones” like those colored plastic data slabs on original Star Trek were “tapes”.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I saw a toddler pretending to take a phone call from an imaginary phone a few weeks ago, and it really threw me that she was holding her “phone” like one would a smartphone (As opposed to putting your thumb to your ear, and outstretching your pinkie towards your mouth).

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          A few years ago I saw an ad for a kids workshop set, with fake tools and a workbench. The workbench had a little bracket for a toy cellphone, and the photo had the kid “playing” in the workshop by pretending to talk on the phone. Saws, hammers, pliers, etc. all around, but he’s on the phone. I thought it was weird.

    • mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are several reasons why people don’t call each other nowadays. This is one.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      We have a “landline” (actually VOIP) at our house and I have a desk phone in my office that I use often. This is one of the reasons. It’s also nice not having to run around the house trying to find my cell phone in emergencies, not to mention VOIP service is dirt cheap.